Pfizer’s nervousness about the origins of its COVID vaccine hides a horror story | News Today

Pfizer’s nervousness about the origins of its COVID vaccine hides a horror story

| Today Headlines | abc News

That story, mostly unknown until now, should at the very least require approval of any employee’s application for religious exemptions based on awareness of employer or government vaccination mandates.

On October 6, with the help of James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas (PV), a Pfizer whistleblower revealed, in leaked internal emails, that company executives, in PV’s words, “tell staff that be secretive about the use of fetal tissue in laboratory tests of the COVID vaccine ”.

The video quotes an email from the company’s senior director of worldwide research admitting that “one or more cell lines with an origin dating back to human fetal tissue have been used in laboratory tests associated with the vaccine program.” The company’s chief scientific officer specifically identifies the cell line involved as “HEK293T cells … (which) are ultimately derived from an aborted fetus.”

Pfizer’s reluctance to reveal the roots of its vaccine origins seems inexplicable for at least three reasons.

TRENDS: Psaki on Inflation: “The American People Are Not Considering Cost-to-Cost Comparisons From This Year To Two Years Ago” (VIDEO)

First, in December, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith of the Catholic Church, in light of the degree of perceived emergency presented by the COVID-19 pandemic, indicated that “it is morally acceptable to receive Covid-19 vaccines that have used cell lines of aborted fetuses in their research and production process. “In non-emergency circumstances, such an action would be considered mortally sinful as” cooperation in evil, “but the Congregation indicated that Pope Francis” examined “his work and” ordered your publication “.

Second, research on human fetal tissue, although controversial (as just noted), has been done since the 1930s and is said to have “helped develop vaccines for a wide range of diseases, such as polio, measles, mumps, rubella, hepatitis A and B, shingles and rabies. “

Third, HEK293, the cell line Pfizer cited, has been around for almost half a century and has been widely used. To cite just one of many examples, HEK293 cells are credited with “many of the antipsychotic drugs used to treat mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.”

One would think that these three factors, especially the de facto blessing of the Pontiff, would have caused Pfizer promote, or at least strongly advocate, his use of the HEK293 cell line as another shining example of scientific advancement resulting from human fetal tissue research.

Details of HEK293’s brutal origins, and to all appearances until very recently, largely undisclosed, explain the company’s deep malaise. Contrary to nearly half a century of misrepresentation and obfuscation, the creation of HEK293 did NOT stem from “abortion” as common people understand it.

A very recent fact serves to confirm this.

In August, the University of Pittsburgh did make a horrible admission. The Center for Medical Progress, which had to enlist the help of Judicial Watch before the university responded to its Freedom of Information Act request, explained that the school’s GUDMAP program (full name: Molecular Anatomy Project of Genito-Urinary Development), with the help of the area Planned Parenthood abortion providers were “allowing babies, some of viability age, to be born alive and then killed by cutting off their kidneys.”

Everyone reading this article should surely agree that once a baby is born alive, killing it should no longer be considered an abortion. Killing a live-born baby is textbook infanticide.

Researchers at Pitt and Planned Parenthood had to resort to this gruesome carnage because it is the best and probably the only way to collect certain usable body parts, particularly the kidneys. Removing viable kidneys requires continuous blood flow, which in turn requires a beating heart, which in turn requires the baby to be alive (or at least almost always) outside the uterus when the kidneys are removed.

The HEK293 line was created in the early 1970s. Months before the University of Pittsburgh admissions, AnnaMaria Cardinalli, an extraordinarily insightful and conscientious writer, detailed the damning truth about its origins in Crisis Magazine in January:

… To obtain a viable embryonic kidney … Children who are healthy enough, who are old enough to have adequately developed kidneys, must be removed from the uterus, alive, usually by caesarean section, and their kidneys must be removed. This must be done without anesthesia for the child, which would decrease the viability of the organs.

… The deliberate murder of an unwanted child (a girl, in the case of HEK 293) took place in precisely the devious way it did to obtain her organs for investigation. The removal of her organs was the direct cause of her death, prior to which, she was a living child, outside the womb.

In email correspondence, Ms Cardinalli indicated, based on her own discussions with medical experts and “the proof of reason,” that in her opinion, “we are genuinely talking about outright infanticide, not abortion.” In his article, he also indicated that he fears that “Pope Francis and Pope Emeritus Benedict did not have this information when they received the vaccines.”

In the decades since HEK293 was created, its two most directly involved scientists, Drs. Alex van der Eb and Franklin Graham have been vague in explaining the origins of the cell line.

As seen in a draft transcript of a 2006 FDA conference (on page 81), Dr. van der Eb states that “The fetus kidney was obtained in 1972, probably. The precise data is no longer known. The fetus, that I remember, was completely normal. Nothing was happening. The reasons for the abortion were unknown to me. You probably knew it at the time, but all this information was lost. “

Graham says that “the exact origin of fetal HEK293 cells is unclear. They could come from a miscarriage or an elective abortion. “

Cardinalli, who was unaware of Graham’s possible “miscarriage” speculation when she wrote her article, claimed that “There is no way that a miscarriage could result in the cell line (as the kidneys cannot remain viable beyond the short period in which they must be harvested) “. It is quite revealing that Dr. Graham has speculated on something that seems clearly impossible.

Regardless of whether any of the scientists’ memory improves, it’s hard to imagine how they could describe their work as anything other than what Cardinalli described and what the statement from the University of Pittsburgh confirmed.

Of course, you are welcome to give it a try.

Meanwhile, it is indefensible for an employer or government entity to try to force people to get punctured or lose their jobs or lose other privileges based on a vaccine whose development originated in infanticide.

Local News News Today Pfizer’s nervousness about the origins of its COVID vaccine hides a horror story

Jewel Beaujolie

I am a fashion designer in the past and I currently write in the fields of fashion, cosmetics, body care and women in general. I am interested in family matters and everything related to maternal, child and family health.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Back to top button